Hinweis: Dieser Beitrag ist auch auf Aberdeens "Thinking aloud"-Plattform verfügbar.
It was a week of contrasts. Sterling fell to its lowest level against the dollar since the mid-1980s, and its lowest against the euro in five years. But it was also a week in which UK stock market indices roared ahead, breaching the psychologically important 7000 barrier. That the two are connected is obvious. Multinational companies with worldwide earnings bases make up a big proportion of the FTSE 100. And for these companies, every dollar of revenue is worth roughly 11p more than it did on 23 June.
Still, it allows voters from both sides of the recent European Union (EU) referendum to say: “I told you so.” The Remain campaigners can point to the precipitous decline in the value of the UK currency as confirming their gloomiest predictions. According to newspaper reports, one result of sterling weakness is that the size of Britain’s economy has now dipped below that of France.
Meanwhile, the victorious Leave campaign can point to soaring equity indices as evidence that Britain is “open for business”. (That said, looked at in US dollar terms, the FTSE 100 is actually down for the year.)
Sterling began to lose its value immediately after the UK electorate voted to leave the EU. This week’s further decline has been largely influenced by messages emanating from the annual conference of the ruling Conservative Party, where politicians took an increasingly hard line on migration and began to talk of a “hard Brexit” with no access to the European single market.
Bad side effects
Elsewhere at the conference, Prime Minister Theresa May appeared to signal that she would be more interventionist in monetary policies than her predecessors. She acknowledged that the emergency measures taken by the Bank of England since the financial crisis – ultra-low interest rates and quantitative easing – had “provided the necessary emergency medicine after the financial crash”. However, she went on, these measures had caused some “bad side effects”.
Global equity markets also produced disparate returns. In the US, the S&P 500 was marginally down amid uncertainty about the economy, courtesy of a report from the International Monetary Fund. By contrast, the FTSE Europe was up slightly. Despite ongoing concerns about Deutsche Bank, financial stocks rebounded as investors became increasingly hopeful that interest rates will not be cut further into negative territory. Japan produced one of the strongest performances. Like the UK, the country’s stock market benefited from a fall in the currency, with the weakening yen helping the Topix index to a 2.1% rise.
Something of a liability
Tesco’s half-year results brought a welcome return to growth. It has been a difficult few years for Britain’s biggest retailer; the company faced an accounting scandal in 2014, after which it promptly suspended its dividend. It has suffered big dents in market share after a ferocious assault by German discount retailers Aldi and Lidl. However, figures for the first half of 2016 show a 38% increase in operating profit to £515 million, and like-for-like sales in Tesco’s core UK business rose 0.9% during the second quarter.
There is a downside, though. One of Mrs May’s aforementioned “bad side effects” has cast a shadow over Tesco’s results. Thanks to the rally in bonds, the investment return it uses to determine pension liabilities has fallen sharply. As a result, its pension deficit has ballooned from £3.2 billion to £5.9 billion. Tesco has effectively dismissed this as a temporary accounting anomaly, seeing no need to increase pension contributions. But if central bank monetary stimuli – and consequent rock-bottom yields – endure into the longer term, many companies will be forced to pay much more into their pension schemes. .
Ever got tired of explaining what it is you actually do? No? Well, spare a thought for an anonymous volcanologist from Honolulu who took to Reddit, the self-proclaimed “front-page of the internet”, to discuss his geological grievances. The lava-loving scientist is so fed up with bad jokes about “vulcanologists” that he has had business cards printed with the words: ‘No, not like “Star Trek”. That’s a good one, though, I haven’t heard it before.’
Make no Bones about it, it’s an enterprising solution to an annoying problem. We hope that a step so boldly taken allows him to Klingon to some dignity.
Performanceergebnisse der Vergangenheit lassen keine Rückschlüsse auf die zukünftige Entwicklung eines Investmentfonds zu. Wert und Rendite einer Anlage in Fonds können steigen oder fallen. Anleger können gegebenenfalls nur weniger als das investierte Kapital ausgezahlt bekommen. Auch Währungsschwankungen können das Investment beeinflussen. Beachten Sie die Vorschriften für Werbung und Angebot von Anteilen im InvFG 2011 § 128 ff. Die Informationen auf www.e-fundresearch.com repräsentieren keine Empfehlungen für den Kauf, Verkauf oder das Halten von Wertpapieren, Fonds oder sonstigen Vermögensgegenständen. Die Informationen des Internetauftritts der e-fundresearch.com Data GmbH wurden sorgfältig erstellt. Dennoch kann es zu unbeabsichtigt fehlerhaften Darstellungen kommen. Eine Haftung oder Garantie für die Aktualität, Richtigkeit und Vollständigkeit der zur Verfügung gestellten Informationen kann daher nicht übernommen werden. Gleiches gilt auch für alle anderen Websites, auf die mittels Hyperlink verwiesen wird. Die e-fundresearch.com Data GmbH lehnt jegliche Haftung für unmittelbare, konkrete oder sonstige Schäden ab, die im Zusammenhang mit den angebotenen oder sonstigen verfügbaren Informationen entstehen. Das NewsCenter ist eine kostenpflichtige Sonderwerbeform der e-fundresearch.com Data GmbH für Asset Management Unternehmen. Copyright und ausschließliche inhaltliche Verantwortung liegt beim Asset Management Unternehmen als Nutzer der NewsCenter Sonderwerbeform. Alle NewsCenter Meldungen stellen Presseinformationen oder Marketingmitteilungen dar.